Femmes, marchés et production textile au Nouveau-Brunswick au cours du XIXe siècle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Women, markets and domestic cloth production in New Brunswick in XIXth century. Until recently, the perpetuation of domestic cloth production in Eastern Canada in the XIXth century has been blamed on poverty. Farm households lacked the resources to acquire factory made fabric from the stores. They were obliged to try to be self sufficient in cloth. In New Brunwick however, other factors seem to have facilitated and even encouraged domestic textile production. The situation corroborates the hypothesis recently put forward by Canadien historians. Domestic cloth production was facilitated by the development of a local infrastructure (carding mills) and the availability of factory made cotton warp. It was meant for barter and market exchanges as well as for self consumption. Women were the ones who wove, and must have found the activity worth their while as domestic cloth fetched high prices and generated comfortable profits. Female weavers consequently could expect to earn almost as much as male wage earners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it