MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Matrix Cracks on the Thermal Diffusivity of a Fiber‐Reinforced Ceramic Composite

2001· article· en· W2065250193 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen R. McDonald, J.R. Dryden, Frank W. Zok

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal diffusivityMaterials scienceComposite materialTransverse planeComposite numberCeramicCeramic matrix compositeIsothermal processThermodynamicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effects of matrix cracks and the attendant interface debonding and sliding on both the longitudinal and the transverse thermal diffusivities of a unidirectional Nicalon/MAS composite are investigated. The diffusivity measurements are made in situ during tensile testing using a phase‐sensitive photothermal technique. The contribution to the longitudinal thermal resistance from each of the cracks is determined from the longitudinal diffusivity along with measurements of crack density. By combining the transverse measurements with the predictions of an effective medium model, the thermal conductance of the interface (characterized by a Biot number) is determined and found to decrease with increasing crack opening displacement, from an initial value of ∼1 to ∼0.3. This degradation is attributed to the deleterious effects of interface sliding on the thermal conductance. Corroborating evidence of degradation in the interface conductance is obtained from the inferred crack conductances coupled with a unit cell model for a fiber composite containing a periodic array of matrix cracks. Additional notable features of the material behavior include: ( i ) reductions of ∼20% in both the longitudinal and the transverse diffusivities at stresses near the ultimate strength, ( ii ) almost complete recovery of the longitudinal diffusivity following unloading, and ( iii ) essentially no change in the transverse diffusivity following unloading. The recovery of the longitudinal diffusivity is attributed to closure of the matrix cracks. By contrast, the degradation in the interface conductance is permanent, as manifest in the lack of recovery of the transverse diffusivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207