Methylation of Sydnone <i>N</i>-Oxides: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Control in the Alkylation Site of an Electron-Rich Heterocycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methylation of the anionic 4-methylcarboxy 1,2,3-oxadiazolate 3-oxide occurs at either the disubstituted ring nitrogen or the oxygen of the N-oxide depending upon the conditions and reagents employed. Alkylation with methyl iodide leads to N-alkylation, while dimethyl sulfate gives O-alkylation and trifluoromethanemethylsulfonate gives a mixture of the two products. The regioselectivity of these methylations has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction of the two products, and these are in turn correlated with their theoretically predicted (B3LYP//6-311++G**) relative energies and vibrational spectra. Theoretically, N-alkylation is expected to give an isomer that is over 10 kcal mol-1 more stable than the O-alkylated product. As a neat melt the kinetic O-alkylation product cleanly isomerizes in 2 h when heated to 140 degrees C to give the thermodynamic N-methylated isomer. Taken together the results illustrate the remarkable new sydnone N-oxide derivatives which are readily accessed in this chemistry, with the N-alkylation of the sydnone N-oxide, corresponding to the first case of such an N-alkylation for a diazenium diolate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".