MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065320680 · doi:10.1177/0021955x06073091

Effect of Nanoclay and Foaming Conditions on the Mechanical Properties of HDPE–Clay Nanocomposite Foams

2007· article· en· W2065320680 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Plastics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceHigh-density polyethyleneNanocompositeComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthPolyethyleneMontmorilloniteModulus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of nanoclay and foaming conditions on the foam morphology and mechanical properties of microcellular high density polyethylene (HDPE)–clay nanocomposite foams are investigated. Clay loadings of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 wt.% are used and the microcellular HDPE–clay nanocomposite foams are prepared by batch foaming process using CO 2 . Uniaxial tensile tests are performed with the nanocomposites and its foams. It is demonstrated that nanoclays in HDPE, with proper clay contents, have a role to improve the mechanical properties, such as elastic modulus and tensile strength. In addition, tensile properties of HDPE–clay foams are reinforced when compared to that of pure HDPE foams. In the case of both nanocomposites and nanocomposite foams, the mechanical properties are improved most at 0.5 wt.% clay loadings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it