MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065337890 · doi:10.1063/1.1413978

Infrared spectra of OCS–hydrogen complexes

2002· article· en· W2065337890 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Tang, A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forceSpectral lineIntermolecular forceVan der Waals moleculeInfrared spectroscopyChemistryAtomic physicsInfraredMoleculeHeliumSpectroscopyHydrogenProlate spheroidSupersonic speedHydrogen atomMolecular physicsPhysicsOpticsGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five distinct species of OCS–hydrogen van der Waals complexes (OCS–orthoH2,–paraH2,–paraD2,–orthoD2, and –HD) have been observed by infrared spectroscopy in the region of the OCS ν1 vibration (≈2062 cm−1) in a pulsed supersonic jet expansion using a tunable diode laser probe. The spectra are those of prolate asymmetric rotors, with observed a-type transitions (ΔK=0), but no b-type transitions (ΔK=±1). The fitted rotational parameters are consistent with structures having intermolecular separations in the range of 3.6–3.8 Å and angles of about 70° between the OCS axis and the hydrogen center of mass. The band origins are slightly red-shifted (−0.05 to −0.20 cm−1) relative to that of the free OCS molecule. The results are of interest due to recent observations of the same complexes trapped in ultracold helium droplets; there is a remarkably close correspondence of the vibrational band origins of the free and trapped species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207