MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065339913 · doi:10.1071/rdv23n1ab318

318 EFFICIENCY OF PROTOCOL P-36, ASSOCIATED WITH EQUINE CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN OR LUTEINIZING HORMONE ADMINISTRATION, IN THE LAST DAY OF SUPERESTIMULATORY TREATMENT, IN NELLORE COWS

2010· article· en· W2065339913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alessandra Conceição de Oliveira, Maria Clara Costa Mattos, M. R. Bastos, José Renato Silva Gonçalves, L. H. Lunardi, R. S. Surjus, Roberto Sartori, C. M. Barros

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquine chorionic gonadotropinLuteinizing hormoneOvulationCloprostenolEstradiol benzoateEstrous cycleInternal medicineEmbryoAnimal scienceAndrologyBiologyEndocrinologyHormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of pLH in replacement of eCG on the last day of P-36 superstimulatory treatment in Nellore donors. Recent studies demonstrated improvement in embryo production when the last 2 doses of FSH were replaced by eCG. However, consecutive use of eCG in bovine superstimulatory protocols may induce antibody against eCG, decreasing embryo production. Twenty-five Nellore cows were randomly allocated in 4 groups: P-36 (control), P-36/eCG, P-36/LH2, and P-36/LH4. All animals underwent 4 treatments in a cross-over design. Donors received an intravaginal device containing 1.0 g of progesterone (IVD, Primer®, Tecnopec, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and oestradiol benzoate (2.0 mg, IM; Estrogin®, Farmavet, Sao Paulo, Brazil) at a random stage of the oestrous cycle (D0). Cows from the control group were superestimulated with decreasing doses of pFSH (133 mg, IM; Folltropin-V®, Bioniche, Ontario, Canada; D5-8). In the P-36/eCG group, the last 2 doses of pFSH were replaced by 2 doses of eCG (200 IU each dose, IM; Folligon®, Intervet, Boxmeer, the Netherlands). In the P-36/LH2 and P-36/LH4 groups, the last 2 doses of pFSH were replaced by 2 doses of 1 and 2 mg of pLH, respectively (IM; Lutropin®, Bioniche). All animals were treated with prostaglandin F2a (150 µg d-cloprostenol, IM; Prolise®, Tecnopec) on D7, and the IVD was removed 36 h after. Ovulation was induced with 12.5 mg of pLH (IM) on D9, and all animals received fixed-time artificial insemination 12 and 24 h after pLH. Embryo flushing was performed on D16. Data were analysed by ANOVA (Proc Mixed, SAS). There was a significant difference in the number of corpus luteum in the eCG group (19.2 ± 2.4) when compared with the LH2 (12.7 ± 2.0) and LH4 groups (12.3 ± 1.5; P < 0.05). In addition, there was a tendency of lower ovulation rate in the LH2 group as compared with the eCG group (50.6 and 67.8%, respectively; P = 0.06). However, there was no difference in viable embryo yield among groups P-36 (3.3 ± 0.7), P-36/eCG (4.5 ± 0.5), P-36/LH2 (3.7 ± 0.8), and P-36/LH4 (4.2 ± 1.0); P > 0.05. In conclusion, eCG can be replaced by pLH (4.0 mg), in the last day of P-36 protocol, without affecting the production of viable embryos in Nellore cows. The authors acknowledge FAPESP (Sao Paulo, Brazil) for funding and fellowships for A. C. S. Oliveira, M. C. C. Mattos, and M. R. Bastos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207