MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065384406 · doi:10.1159/000212284

Human Pituitary Growth Hormone Cells in Old Age

2009· article· en· W2065384406 on OpenAlexaff
Lilian Calderon, Nancy Ryan, Kálmán Kovács

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHormoneGrowth hormoneInvolution (esoterism)AutopsyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPituitary glandProlactinMedicineBiologyPhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pituitaries obtained at autopsy from 18 men and 17 women, over 80 years of age, who died of various acute illness, were investigated histologically by various staining procedures, including the immunoperoxidase technique. Compared with pituitaries of 10 male and 10 female subjects who died of short-lasting diseases between 20 and 56 years of age, no involution of growth hormone cells was found in pituitaries of the older group. Incidence, distribution, granulation and immunoreactivity of growth hormone cells showed no apparent differences related to age and sex. Lack of regression of growth hormone cells with advancing age indicates that the pituitary can produce growth hormone in old subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerontologySame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207