MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065418330 · doi:10.1139/z03-021

Functional morphology of sexually selected gentalia in the water strider <i>Aquarius remigis</i>

2003· article· en· W2065418330 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Daphne J. Fairbairn, Richard Vermette, Narinder Nath Kapoor, Nayer Zahiri

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologySexual selectionAnatomyLobeContext (archaeology)Sexual conflictSex organGerridaeHeteropteraPhallus (fungus)ZoologyEvolutionary biologyMale genitaliaPaleontologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the water strider Aquarius remigis (Say), sexual selection favours males with longer genitalia. We used video analysis plus light and scanning electron microscopy to examine the structure, movement, and articulation of the genitalia as a first step in determining the functional basis of this selection. Male A. remigis are characterized by long, robust genital segments; a marked ventral median notch in the posterior margin of the pregenital segment; an enlarged phallus tipped with a uniquely prolonged sclerotized plate; and a large, spine-covered, membranous lobe that inflates within the female's reproductive tract. Detailed examinations of genital interactions prior to and during copulation allow us to deduce the functional significance of these distinguishing traits. We postulate that by increasing the length, mobility, strength, and rigidity of the phallus, the first three traits increase the ability of males to achieve intromission in spite of active female resistance, and to maintain intromission during the prolonged copulations characteristic of this species. Inflation of the large, spinous lobe probably contributes to the latter function, and may also directly affect fertilization success by displacing or damaging sperm from previous males. We discuss these interpretations in the context of current theories of genitalic coevolution and sexual conflict in the Gerridae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207