MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065424026 · doi:10.1071/aseg2015ab195

Using AMT in the new Zambian copperbelt (Enterprise and Kansanshi case study)

2015· article· en· W2065424026 on OpenAlexafffund
Adouley Guirou

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsFirst Quantum Minerals (Canada)
FundersFirst Quantum Minerals
KeywordsGeologyGeographyMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During 2012 and 2013 FQML through its Zambian exploration team acquired about 300 line kilometres of Audio magneto telluric (AMT) survey for copper and nickel exploration in the north western Zambian copper belt. Kansanshi mine and the new $2bn Kalumbila (Enterprise Nickel deposit) development project are the survey locations (see Figure1). Hence this paper is a case study discussing major aspects of the projects including but not limited to major outcomes, difficulties encountered as well as solutions for futures data acquisition in similar geological settings. Stunning results were achieved whereby basement fault and many interesting geological features were identified (See Figure 2, Tm mode section along Line 19) over Enterprise and doming structures in Kansanshi (See figure 3).However limiting factors such as mine equipment noise, accessibility, swamps, tropical rain forest and wild life were some downside during the survey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207