MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065443812 · doi:10.1109/tap.2012.2201098

Analysis and Design of Slitted Waveguides With Suppressed Slot-Mode Using Periodic FDTD

2012· article· en· W2065443812 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor R. Cameron, Adrian Sutinjo, M. Okoniewski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodMode (computer interface)PhysicsWidebandWaveguideBoundary (topology)RadiationBoundary value problemFinite difference methodComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisComputational physicsAlgorithmOpticsMathematicsElectrical engineeringQuantum mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characteristics of the slot- and perturbed TE <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sub> modes in a slitted waveguide are studied for the purpose of suppressing the undesired slot-mode. The use of the finite difference time domain (FDTD) with periodic boundary conditions allows the extraction of the individual complex wavenumbers of the two modes, and thus the tracking of the modes as modifications are made to the structure. Two structures are presented, the first suppressing the propagation of the slot-mode, and the second suppressing the radiation of the slot-mode. Experimental validation is presented supporting the numerical results. It will be shown that a wideband suppression of the slot-mode propagation is achievable. However, there is a significant impact on the propagation characteristics of the desired perturbed TE <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sub> mode. Conversely, the suppression of the slot-mode radiation is achievable with minimal impact on the perturbed TE <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sub> mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207