MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065458378 · doi:10.1002/gcc.20088

Various types of rearrangements target <i>TLX3</i> locus in T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2004· article· en· W2065458378 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Ying Su, Maryvonne Busson, Véronique Della Valle, Paola Ballerini, Nicole Dastugue, Pascaline Talmant, Adolfo A. Ferrando, Dominique Bluteau, Serge Romana, Roland Berger, Olivier Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes Chromosomes and Cancer · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromosomal translocationBiologyBreakpointGeneticsEctopic expressionLocus (genetics)GeneMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most chromosomal translocations observed in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) often produce transcriptional activation of transcription factor oncogenes. Ectopic expression of the TLX3 (also known as HOX11L2) gene has been shown to be associated with a cryptic t(5;14)(q35;q32) translocation specific for a subtype of T-ALL. Here we report several examples of variant and alternative translocations resulting in expression of TLX3 in T-ALL, and we describe three of these translocations in detail. In particular, the CDK6 gene was rearranged in two t(5;7)(q35;q21) translocations. In two additional instances, fusion of the BCL11B (also known as CTIP2) and RANBP17/TLX3 loci were shown to result from subtle genomic insertion/deletion within these loci. This study further underscores that TLX3 expression in T-ALL is strongly associated with the presence of genomic rearrangements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes Chromosomes and CancerSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207