Retail Investors and Gold Buying Behaviour – A Perpetual Study of Indian Retail Investors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gold is one of the oldest precious metals known to man and for years it has been valued as a global currency, an investment, a commodity and an object of beauty and India is not an exception to this. India’s love affair with gold is timeless spanning over centuries and millennia. With globalisation various investment avenues were made available to investors. However there is difference in the perceptions of the investors. So this paper makes an attempt to understand the factors that influence the buying behavior of Indian retail investors with respect to gold buying. The objectives of the paper are to identify the favorable and unfavorable perception of the consumers towards their belief in Gold buying behavior, towards their Motives behind the Physical gold buying behavior, towards the Risk behind gold buying (both physical gold as well as Paper form -Mutual fund / ETF) behavior and towards gold buying behavior due to various attributes of gold. The results of the study indicate that the ease at the time of purchase and high liquidity has resulted into Gold being highly preferred Investment Avenue as against the others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it