MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065490656 · doi:10.5755/j01.em.17.1.2272

THE RATIONALITY FOR GOVERNMENT SPONSORED VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDS IN LITHUANIA: INNOVATION PERSPECTIVE

2012· article· en· W2065490656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vytautas Snieška, Vitalija Venckuvienė

Bibliographic record

VenueECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPrivate Equity and Venture Capital
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenture capitalSocial venture capitalBusinessCorporationFinanceGovernment (linguistics)Order (exchange)Economic interventionismRationalityCapital (architecture)Financial capitalEconomicsMarket economyHuman capitalPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is widely accepted that early stage SMEs encounter many obstacles which restrict their innovation performance. Limited access to finance is considered as the key obstacle for business development in its early stage. Market failures emerging due to lack of risk capital provision to early stage firms are one of most popular rationality for governments’ intervention in the venture capital market. Following this purpose many countries around the world are launching various public policy schemes in order to diminish lack of supply of capital to early stage SMEs, for instance Yozma in Israel, SBIC in U.S., Labour Sponsored Venture Capital Corporation in Canada and etc. In this paper we refer to government sponsored venture capital fund as a venture capital fund raised from public and private sources in order to meet public policy objectives – to create favourable environment for early stage business development and to give an impetus for innovation creation potential in SMEs.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.1.2272

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENTSame topicPrivate Equity and Venture CapitalFrench-language works237,207