MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065511906 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2014.6853683

Towards optimal resource allocation for differentiated multimedia services in cloud computing environment

2014· article· en· W2065511906 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoming Nan, Yifeng He, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceResource allocationQuality of serviceResource (disambiguation)Queueing theoryKey (lock)Resource management (computing)Service (business)Distributed computingDifferentiated servicesComputer networkMultimediaComputer securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud-based multimedia services have been widely used in recent years. As the growing scale, users often have quite diverse quality of service (QoS) expectations. A key challenge for differentiated services is how to optimally allocate cloud resources to satisfy different users. In this paper, we study resource allocation problems for differentiated multimedia services. We first propose a queueing model to characterize differentiated services in cloud. Based on the model, we optimize cloud resources in the first-come first-served (FCFS) scenario and priority scenario. In each scenario, we formulate and solve the optimal resource allocation problem to minimize resource cost under response time constraints. We conduct extensive simulations with practical parameters of Amazon EC2. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed resource allocation schemes can optimally configure resources to provide satisfactory services at the minimal resource cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207