MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065512983 · doi:10.1521/jsyt.2005.24.4.66

Video Exceptions: An Empirical Case Study Involving a Child with Developmental Disabilities

2005· article· en· W2065512983 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John J. Murphy, Michael W. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systemic Therapies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)PsychologyAccountabilityDisciplineDevelopmental psychologyProcess (computing)PsychotherapistComputer sciencePsychiatryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-modeling is a unique competency-based intervention in which clients view videotapes of themselves engaged in non-problem behavior (i.e., “video exceptions”). This article describes the integration of self-modeling and solution-focused “exceptions to the problem” into an intervention designed to increase the use of expressive communication (signing) by William, a nine-year-old boy with developmental disabilities. William's signing rapidly and markedly increased following intervention. In addition to describing the process and outcomes of the intervention, this article illustrates the use of practical accountability methods, and advocates for cross-disciplinary integration of therapeutic practices among family therapists, psychologists, and other helping professionals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systemic TherapiesSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207