MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065546974 · doi:10.1353/cat.0.0265

A Local Society in Transition. The Henryków Book and Related Documents (review)

2009· article· en· W2065546974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Björn Weiler

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransition (genetics)HistoryPolitical scienceGenealogyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Local Society in Transition. The Henryków Book and Related Documents Björn Weiler A Local Society in Transition. The Henryków Book and Related Documents. By Piòtr Górecki. [Studies and Texts, Vol. 155.] (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. 2007. Pp. xii, 284. C$74.95. ISBN 978-0-888-44155-X.) The study of medieval Europe has for a long time focused on its perceived core: England, France, Iberia, and Italy, at best with a passing glance at Germany. The “periphery” in Scandinavia and especially Central and Eastern Europe, by contrast, has remained largely beyond the gaze of those not already working on these regions. This has begun to change in recent years, with studies such as Robert Bartlett’s The Making of Europe (Princeton, 1993) seeking to bring Eastern and Central Europe into the mainstream of medieval European history, or Nora Berend’s work on Hungary. A renewed interest in Central and Eastern European history has further been fanned by the ongoing project at the Central European University in Budapest to make available reprints of Latin editions of medieval sources (with the original editions often unavailable outside specialized research libraries in the “Old West”), accompanied by up-to-date commentaries and modern English translations. The present volume, by the leading Western expert on the history of medieval Poland, who has spent the last twenty years conveying the splendor and importance of medieval Poland to Western audiences, forms part of this renewed impetus. A Local Society offers a monograph-length introduction to and a fluent and wellannotated translation of a cartulary together with a foundation history with bishops’ list, composed probably in the late-thirteenth century (the sole surviving manuscript stems from the fourteenth) at the Cistercian abbey of Henryków in modern Silesia. The book is designed for an audience of both undergraduates and scholars: Górecki mentions just how much work on the book has benefited from his teaching, in both the United States and Europe, and the introduction offers a thoughtful and lucid guide to basic terms, structures, and historiographical debates. While, especially in the early stages, some of that guidance presupposes virtually no familiarity with medieval Europe, this may reflect the challenges of teaching medieval Europe to an audience of Californian adolescents, and the introduction moves, in any case, very quickly to a most lucid exposition of the Henryków Book’s wider context, of great service not only to undergraduates but also to scholars as yet unfamiliar with the Polish experience. We owe Górecki a collective debt of gratitude for producing a work of such passion and great scholarship. The text is an important one for a number of reasons. It is one of the longest surviving documents from medieval Poland and, alongside the recent reprint and translation of the Gesta Principum Polonorum (2003), makes two key [End Page 146] texts of medieval Polish history available to an Anglophone audience. It covers a period of immense and rapid change: the increasing settlement of Germanspeaking newcomers, succession struggles within the ducal dynasty, and the Mongol invasions. The Henryków Book thus illustrates the impact of epochal and sometimes cataclysmic events on a specific local society, documented in much greater detail than elsewhere in the Latin Middle Ages. It provides invaluable documentation for the social, economic, and political structures of the thirteenth century, used to great effect by Górecki in his introduction. It demonstrates to just what extent the Polish experience both reflected and modified broader European trends and developments, and how paying due heed to these materials can broaden our understanding not just of Silesia but also of medieval Christendom as a whole. It finally—unusually for a cartulary, and in no small measure thanks to Górecki’s fluent translation and careful annotation—makes a good read. It includes some wonderful vignettes, such as one involving the duke Boleslaw the Tall, who, to keep his subjects as far away from him as possible, equipped his residences with such elaborate secret exits and passageways that the monks who sought to confirm one of their privileges needed to take extraordinary measures to actually locate him. Numerous such episodes...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207