MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065568268 · doi:10.1155/2013/498214

New Perspectives on Integrating Self-Regulated Learning at School

2013· article· en· W2065568268 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bracha Kramarski, Annemie Desoete, Maria Bannert, Susanne Narciss, Nancy E. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation Research International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceSociologyPsychologyMedical educationPedagogyMedia studiesMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Department of Education, Bar-Ilan University, 52100 Ramat-Gan, Israel 2 Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 3Department of Human-Computer Media, Wuerzburg University, Wuerzburg, Germany 4Department of Psychology, Technische Universitat Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany 5 Department of Educational &Counselling Psychology and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.019
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.431 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation Research InternationalSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207