Cross-talk between the Paired Domain and the Homeodomain of Pax3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pax3 protein has two DNA binding domains, a Paired domain (PD) and a paired-type Homeo domain (HD). Although the PD and HD can bind to cognate DNA sequences when expressed individually, genetic and biochemical data indicate that the two domains are functionally interdependent in intact Pax3. The mechanistic basis of this functional interdependence is unknown and was studied by protease sensitivity. Pax3 was modified by the creation of Factor Xa cleavage sites at discrete locations in the PD, the HD, and in the linker segment joining the PD and the HD (Xa172, Xa189, and Xa216) in individual Pax3 mutants. The effect of Factor Xa insertions on protein stability and on DNA binding by the PD and the HD was measured using specific target site sequences. Independent insertions at position 100 in the linker separating the first from the second helix-turn-helix motif of the PD and at position 216 immediately upstream of the HD were found to be readily accessible to Factor Xa cleavage. The effect of DNA binding by the PD or the HD on accessibility of Factor Xa sites inserted in the same or in the other domain was monitored and quantitated for multiple mutants bearing different numbers of Xa sites at each position. In general, DNA binding reduced accessibility of all sites, suggesting a more compact and less solvent-exposed structure of DNA-bound versus DNA-free Pax3. Results of dose response and time course experiments were consistent and showed that DNA binding by the PD not only caused a local structural change in the PD but also caused a conformational change in the HD (P3OPT binding to Xa216 mutants); similarly, DNA binding by the HD also caused a conformational change in the PD (P2 binding to Xa100 mutants). These results provide a structural basis for the functional interdependence of the two DNA binding domains of Pax3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".