The effect of activity during early postnatal development on motor unit size
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At early stages of neuromuscular development, motor unit territory is expanded, with each muscle fibre being supplied by several axons. During postnatal development, some synapses are eliminated, motor unit size decreases, and the adult distribution of motor unit sizes emerges. This process depends on activity, since it proceeds more rapidly when the nerve is activated and is slower when activity is reduced. Here we studied whether, in addition to influencing the rate of retraction of motor unit territory, activity during the critical period of development affects the final outcome of the distribution of motor unit sizes. The sciatic nerve of 8- to 12-day-old rats was stimulated daily. One week later the tension of the extensor digitorum longus muscle and that of its individual motor units was recorded. The sizes of individual motor units were calculated and compared with those from animals that received no stimulation. The distribution of motor unit sizes from stimulated muscles was not significantly different from those from control muscles. Therefore, we conclude that although activity increases the rate at which motor units attain their adult size, it does not influence the final outcome of motor unit size distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".