MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065592981 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450800428

The Effect of Adding Phosphate on the Size of Extremely Fine Needle‐like Lepidocrocite Particles Prepared by Oxidizing an Aqueous Suspension of Ferrous Hydroxide

2002· article· en· W2065592981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Naoki Mihara, Hiroyuki Kawasaki, Hidehiro Kumazawa, Woo‐Sik Choi, Jung‐Sup Kwak, Hee‐kyu Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicIron oxide chemistry and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLepidocrociteFerrousAqueous solutionOxidizing agentAqueous suspensionHydroxideSuspension (topology)Particle sizeChemistryPhosphateOxygenParticle (ecology)Inorganic chemistryReaction rate constantMaterials scienceNuclear chemistryKineticsGoethiteAdsorptionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extremely fine particles of needle‐like lepidocrocite (γ‐FeOOH) were synthesized by the oxidation of aqueous suspensions of ferrous hydroxide using a bubble column with draft tube at a constant temperature of 30°C, and the effects of the reaction conditions or the oxidation rate were investigated in order to determine the parameters that control the particle size. When the concentration of oxygen in the feed stream was varied under a constant gas velocity, the mean size based on the major axis of a needle‐like particle decreased from 0.7 µm to 0.4 µm with increasing oxidation rate. By adding of NaH 2 PO 4 to an aqueous Fe(OH) 2 suspension, in concentrations up to 1.0 mol/m 3 during the air oxidation, and up to 0.9 mol/m 3 during the oxidation with 30% and 50% O 2 , the major axis could be reduced to ca. 0.3 µm with the minor axis and the oxidation rate remained almost unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIron oxide chemistry and applicationsFrench-language works237,207