The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ito et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1141-1149 (2001)] demonstrated that listeners can reliably identify vowel stimuli on the basis of relative formant amplitude in the absence of, or in spite of, F2 peak frequency. In the present study, formant frequencies and global spectral tilt are manipulated independently in synthetic steady-state vowels. Listeners' identification of these sounds demonstrate strong perceptual effects for both local (formant frequency) and global (spectral tilt) acoustic characteristics. Subsequent experiments reveal that effects of spectral tilt are attenuated in synthetic stimuli for which formant center frequencies change continuously. When formant peaks are kinematic, perceptual salience of the relative amplitudes of low- and high-frequency formants (as determined by spectral tilt) is mitigated. Because naturally produced English vowels are rarely spectrally static, one may conclude that gross spectral properties may play only a limited role in perception of fluently produced vowel sounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".