The Peroxidase Activity of a Hemin−DNA Oligonucleotide Complex: Free Radical Damage to Specific Guanine Bases of the DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A specific DNA oligonucleotide--hemin complex (PS2.M--hemin complex) that exhibits DNA-enhanced peroxidative activity was studied by EPR and UV--visible spectroscopy and by chemical probing analysis. EPR data obtained from low-temperature experiments on the PS2.M--hemin complex showed both a low-field g approximately 6 and a high-field g approximately 2 signal. These EPR signals are typical of high-spin ferric heme with axial symmetry as judged by the EPR spectrum of six-coordinate heme iron in acidic Fe(III)-myoglobin. This similarity is consistent with the presence of two axial ligands to the heme iron within the PS2.M--hemin complex, one of which is a water molecule. Optical analyses of the acid-base transition for the hemin complex yielded a pK(a) value for the water ligand of 8.70 +/- 0.03 (mean +/- SD). Low-temperature EPR analysis coupled with parallel spin-trapping investigations following the reaction of the PS2.M--hemin complex and hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) indicated the formation of a carbon-centered radical, most likely on the PS2.M oligonucleotide. Chemical probing analysis identified specific guanine bases within the PS2.M sequence that underwent oxidative damage upon reaction with H(2)O(2). These and other experimental findings support the hypothesis that the interaction of specific guanines of PS2.M with the bound hemin cofactor might contribute to the superior peroxidative activity of the PS2.M--hemin complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".