MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065626696 · doi:10.3138/ctr.154.003

Growing Opportunities: Theatre Thrives in Rural Saskatchewan

2013· article· en· W2065626696 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marian Powell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaAmateurThe artsFrontierPerforming artsTheatre studiesArtVisual artsMandateGeographyMedia studiesSociologyArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saskatchewan rural communities provide fertile ground professional theatre. Professional theatres in small communities thrive by embracing a unique mandate, such as the commitment to produce new Saskatchewan and established Canadian plays at Dancing Sky Theatre in Meacham, 67 kilometres east of Saskatoon. Some have combined theatre with other arts, such as the combination theatre, tea room, and art gallery at Rosthern’s Station Arts Centre, located in the former CN railway depot. Ken Mitchell’s Burning Sun Theatre in Moose Jaw is known for historical drama and epics of frontier culture, such as Spirits of the Trail (2009) or The Medicine Line (2007). Of the many communities with amateur theatres, the Battleford Community Players have committed to producing short new Saskatchewan plays in cabaret formats and dessert-theatre festivals. In these and other examples, Saskatchewan rural theatres provide models for communities across the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207