MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065630096 · doi:10.1159/000117168

Dopamine Uptake Sites and Dopamine Receptors in Parkinson’s Disease and Schizophrenia

2008· article· en· W2065630096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neurology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopamineDopamine receptorReceptorDopamine receptor D2Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Parkinson's diseaseInternal medicineDopamine receptor D3EndocrinologyMedicineNeuroscienceBiologyDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dopamine uptake sites, labelled by 3 nM [3H]GBR 12935, were reduced by 28-34% in post-mortem Parkinson's diseased striata (n = 22) compared to control striata (n = 28). There was no significant difference between post-mortem striata from schizophrenics (n = 16) and controls. Both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are consistently elevated in Parkinson's diseased striata from patients who have not been medicated with L-dopa pre-mortem. Both these receptors are down-regulated by L-dopa pre-mortem. In schizophrenia, however, while the density of D1 receptors is similar to control, the D2 receptors are consistently elevated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it