Geotaxis and phototaxis are not determinant factors for white pine weevil (Col., Curculionidae) oviposition location on intact trees and severed treetops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this investigation was to determine if external factors such as phototaxis and geotaxis determine oviposition site location by reproductively active female white pine weevils, Pissodes strobi (Peck), on intact trees or cut treetops. In prior studies, light and gravity, both external tree factors, were consistently linked with oviposition location. In this study, the external factors that were varied in whole trees or cut treetops, included two weevil populations and two tree species in upright, inverted and horizontal orientations with thick or thin stems, indoor and outdoor locations, warm and cool, wet and dry, and light and dark conditions. The results show that 100% of the oviposition occurred at or near treetops, regardless of external factors. The results are unequivocal; they are without variance. These findings suggest that the reproductively active female weevil's feeding preference is for primary cortex tissue, an internal tree factor. The primary cortex thickness gradient could account for these weevils’ capability to locate treetops, where the thickest primary cortex tissue occurs, even when treetops are not at the highest or brightest locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".