MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065691974 · doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2011.07.005

Youth Manifesto on Non-Communicable Diseases

2011· article· en· W2065691974 on OpenAlexaff
Sandeep P. Kishore, Karen R. Siegel, Aria Ahmad, Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Mohammed K. Ali, Phillip Baker, Sanjay Basu, Asaf Bitton, Gerald S. Bloomfield, Gene Bukhman, Eleanor Emery, Andrea B Feigl, Karen A. Grépin, Mark D. Huffman, Kiti Kajana, Shweta Khandelwal, Kavitha Kolappa, Chenhui Liu, Naaznin Lokhandwala, Vishal Marwah, Modi Mwatsama, Nicole L. Novak, Shantanu Nundy, Paul H. Park, Cristina Parsons Perez, Matthew R. Price, Nikka Rapkin, Hester Rice, Benjamin Seligman, Sumit K. Shah, João da Silva, Devi Sridhar, David Stückler, Rajesh Vedanthan, Justin Zaman, The Young Professionals rsquo Chronic Disease Network

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Heart · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManifestoChecklistMedicineObservational studyGlobal healthStrengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiologyPublishingFamily medicineMedical educationPublic healthPolitical sciencePathologyPsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global Heart is the official and primary publication of the World Heart Federation, offering a platform for the dissemination of knowledge on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programmes in the area of cardiovascular disease. Global Heart welcomes research results, points of view and educational material on the prevention, treatment and control of cardiovascular disease with a special focus on low and middle-income countries which are facing the brunt of epidemiological transition.Global Heart strongly encourages authors to adhere to CONSORT, STROBE, STARD, and PRISMA guidelines for reporting of clinical trials, observational studies, diagnostic test accuracy papers, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Authors are required for submission to download and complete the appropriate Equator Network checklist: http://www.equator-network.org/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal HeartSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207