Bibliographic record
Abstract
Revenant sur l’imaginaire cinématographique de la « première mondialisation » des années 1890-1940, innervée par le paradigme du rythme, cet article étudie plus particulièrement Melodie der Welt (1929). Walter Ruttmann y porte à une échelle internationale certains motifs caractéristiques des expérimentations avant-gardistes des années 1920, afin de proposer une véritable « Symphonie du monde ». La réception contemporaine de ce film – notamment en France, chez Alexandre Arnoux, André Levinson et Émile Vuillermoz – permet de le rapporter aux conceptions universalistes qui font florès dans le champ artistique de la seconde moitié des années 1920, telle la notion de « Grand Rythme » chez l’historien d’art Élie Faure. Les idées de simultanéité et de synchronisme, au-delà des frontières comme des époques, reviennent dans Melodie der Welt au travers de certaines formes collectives d’expressivité gestuelle rythmée, au premier plan desquelles figurent la danse et le travail. À la même époque, on peut trouver des positions opposées à cette démarche dans divers textes de Siegfried Kracauer, notamment ceux qui comparent la démarche de Ruttmann à celle de Dziga Vertov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".