Structure-function studies of the receptors for complement C1q
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C1q is an essential component of the phylogenetically ancient innate complement (C) system and is crucial to our natural ability to ward off infection and clear toxic cell debris (e.g. amyloid fibrils, apoptotic cells). Several candidate C1q receptors [C1q receptor for phagocytosis enhancement (C1qRp), complement receptor (CR) 1, calreticulin (CRT), binding protein for the globular head of C1q (gC1qbp)] have been described, and the aim of this review is to shed light on their structure-function relationships. One cell-surface molecule, C1qRp, has emerged as a defence collagen receptor for C1q, as well as mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and surfactant protein A. C1qRp (also known as the AA4 antigen in rodents) is the antigen recognized by a pro-adhesive monoclonal antibody called mNI-11 and antibodies against CD93, but recent results failed to confirm C1q binding activity. CR1 (CD35), a multifunctional receptor both in its ligand specificity and in its C regulation activities, is found on circulating monocytes and neutrophils, but the major site of expression is B-lymphocytes. As a receptor, CR1 binds to C1q, other C opsonins (C4b, C3b, iC3b) and MBL, and as such, has been involved in promoting phagocytosis. Several studies support a role for the cell surface receptor for the collagenous domains of C1q (cC1qR; also known as CRT). CRT belongs to the family of heat-shock proteins, the most abundant and ubiquitous soluble intracellular proteins. Though CRT does not have a transmembrane domain, it seems to mediate phagocytosis of the apoptotic cells through association with CD91. A 33 kDa protein interacts with the globular head of C1q and, logically, has been termed gC1qbp. This protein is located in mitochondria, suggesting that gC1qbp is not a cell-surface receptor itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".