MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065816243 · doi:10.1145/2463372.2463415

Evolving structures for electronic dance music

2013· article· en· W2065816243 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDanceFocus (optics)Generative grammarDomain (mathematical analysis)Process (computing)Evolutionary musicElectronic dance musicSoftwareArtificial intelligenceEvolutionary algorithmMachine learningInteractive evolutionary computationEvolutionary programmingMathematicsProgramming languageArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present GESMI (Generative Electronica Statistical Modeling Instrument), a software system that generates Electronic Dance Music (EDM) using evolutionary methods. While using machine learning, GESMI rests on a corpus analysed and transcribed by domain experts. We describe a method for generating the overall form of a piece and individual parts, including specific patterns sequences, using evolutionary algorithms. Lastly, we describe how the user can use contextually-relevant target features to query the generated database of strong individual patterns. As our main focus is upon artistic results, our methods themselves use an iterative, somewhat evolutionary, design process based upon our reaction to results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207