Mathematical modeling of crystallization analysis fractionation of ethylene/1‐hexene copolymers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Crystallization analysis fractionation (Crystaf) is a polymer characterization technique for estimating the chemical composition distributions of semicrystalline copolymers. Although Crystaf has been widely used during the recent years, it is still a relatively new polymer characterization technique. More quantitative understanding of its fractionation mechanism is essential for further developments. In this work, three ethylene/1‐hexene copolymers with different 1‐hexene fractions, but similar number‐average molecular weights, were analyzed by Crystaf at several cooling rates. A mathematical model was proposed to describe the effect of comonomer fraction and cooling rate on Crystaf fractionation from a fundamental point of view. The model describes the experimental Crystaf profiles of ethylene/1‐hexene copolymers with different 1‐hexene fractions measured at distinct cooling rates very well. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1010–1017, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it