MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065856633 · doi:10.1139/p10-032

The unsteady Boltzmann kinetic equation and non-equilibrium thermodynamics of an electron gas for the Rayleigh flow problem

2010· article· en· W2065856633 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aly Maher Abourabia, Taha Zakaraia Abdel Wahid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsThermodynamicsDistribution functionThermodynamic equilibriumBoltzmann's entropy formulaBoltzmann equationKinetic energyEntropy (arrow of time)Maxwell–Boltzmann distributionClassical mechanicsElectronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the framework of irreversible thermodynamics, the characteristics of the Rayleigh flow problem of a rarified electron gas extracted from neutral atoms is examined and proved to obey the entropic behavior for gas systems. A model kinetic equation of the BGK (Bhatnager–Gross–Krook) type is solved, using the method of moments with a two-sided distribution function. Various macroscopic properties of the electron gas, such as the mean velocity, the shear stress, and the viscosity coefficient, together with the induced electric and magnetic fields, are investigated with respect to both distance and time. The distinction between the perturbed velocity distribution functions and the equilibrium velocity distribution function at different time values is illustrated. We restrict our study to the domain of irreversible thermodynamics processes with small deviation from the equilibrium state to estimate the entropy, entropy production, entropy flux, thermodynamic force, and kinetic coefficient and verify the celebrated Boltzmann H-theorem for non-equilibrium thermodynamic properties of the system. The ratios between the different contributions of the internal energy changes, based upon the total derivatives of the extensive parameters, are predicted via Gibbs’ equation for both diamagnetic and paramagnetic plasmas. The results are applied to a typical model of laboratory argon plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207