MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065858755 · doi:10.5430/air.v2n4p63

Impact of the characteristics of data sets on incremental learning

2013· article· en· W2065858755 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Marques Ciarelli, Elias Oliveira, Evandro Ottoni Teatini Salles

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Computer scienceTask (project management)Set (abstract data type)Artificial neural networkIncremental learningMachine learningArtificial intelligencePlasticityData setBoundary (topology)Class (philosophy)Data miningPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little attention has been paid to identifying the characteristics of a data set that provide favorable conditions for the task of incremental learning. In this work, several metrics were used to characterize data sets and identify the characteristics that may influence the trade-off between stability and plasticity. Three metrics are proposed for the evaluation of stability, plasticity and the trade-off between them in incremental techniques. The experiments were carried out using four incremental neural networks, and the results showed that the shape of the class boundary and spatial distribution of the samples have a great influence on this trade-off.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.083
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence ResearchSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207