MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065882648 · doi:10.1115/1.1580852

An Improved Time Domain Simulation for Dynamic Milling at Small Radial Immersions

2003· article· en· W2065882648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsDiscretizationVibrationTime domainImmersion (mathematics)Deflection (physics)Stability (learning theory)MechanicsControl theory (sociology)Dynamic simulationMaterials scienceComputer scienceMathematicsPhysicsSimulationMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an improved milling time domain model to simulate vibratory cutting conditions at very small radial widths of cut. The improved kinematics model allows simulation of very small radial immersions. The model can predict forces, surface finish, and chatter stability, accurately accounting for non-linear effects that are difficult to model analytically. The discretized cutter and workpiece kinematics and dynamic models are used to represent the exact trochoidal motion of the cutter, and to investigate the effects of forced vibrations and changing radial immersion due to deflection and vibrations on chatter stability. Three dimensional surface finish profiles are predicted and are compared to measured results. Stability lobes generated from the time domain simulation are also shown for various cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it