MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065895193 · doi:10.1111/1911-3838.12032

Fair Trade Community Café Expansion

2014· article· en· W2065895193 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Karen Lightstone, Daphne Rixon

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounting Perspectives · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoffee research and impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFranchiseGeneral partnershipBusinessInvestment (military)FinanceMarketingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This case concerns the expansion of a small café in the Atlantic provinces of Canada. Ray Merriam had successfully operated a fair trade café in Truro for two years and was ready to expand his business by opening cafés in other locations. He has received an offer from an investor for partnership in a new café in the same time. While Ray was really excited about the investment, he had been considering expanding the business through franchising. Students will have an opportunity to research partnership and franchise agreements. They are expected to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each and make a recommendation to Ray. The typical issues arising in a franchise or partnership agreement should be addressed. This practical experience would likely be invaluable for the future of many students who open their own businesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounting PerspectivesSame topicCoffee research and impactsFrench-language works237,207