Physiopathologie des douleurs pelvi-périnéales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La physiopathologie des douleurs pelvi-périnéales est complexe. Sa compréhension nécessite des compétences anatomiques et neurophysiologiques dans ce domaine. Il faut cesser de raisonner en termes d’organe, mais plutôt s’attarder à comprendre et à conceptualiser les mécanismes à la base de la genèse et de la régulation de la douleur au niveau local, régional, spinal et central. Parmi les syndromes les plus souvent rencontrés, on retrouve la cystite interstitielle, les différents types de douleurs vulvaires, la douleur pelvienne chez l’homme, les douleurs musculosquelettiques, le syndrome du releveur et la proctalgia fugax. On ne saurait passer sous silence le syndrome du côlon irritable (SCI), souvent apparenté à ces pathologies et cité lors de l’anamnèse. Toutes ces douleurs ont en commun une hypersensibilisation périphérique, voire centrale comme conséquence d’un bombardement chronique surtout nociceptif. Les hypothèses de travail, pour expliquer ces douleurs, appellent des facteurs inflammatoires, immunologiques, génétiques, neurologiques, neuro-endocriniens et psychologiques, alors que l’étiologie est le plus souvent inconnue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".