MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065912075 · doi:10.1017/s095926950600264x

L'influence du paradigme verbal de la langue maternelle sur la variabilité morphologique en acquisition du français L2 par des apprenants adultes

2007· article· fr· W2065912075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of French Language Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCline (biology)Political scienceArtSociologyPopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, j'examine l'influence de la langue maternelle sur la variabilité morphologique en production orale spontanée chez 15 apprenants hispanophones du français. L'incidence des formes infinitives en contextes tensés est élevé chez les débutants et décline par la suite. En revanche, l'incidence des formes tensées en contextes non-tensés est très faible, ce qui diffère des apprenants anglophones du français (Prévost, 2003). Cette différence proviendrait du fait que l'espagnol possède des marqueurs infinitifs audibles, contrairement à l'anglais. La surgénéralisation des formes infinitives serait due à la lourdeur des coûts computationnels associés à la sélection des formes tensées, et non à une déficience grammaticale (Meisel, 1997).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it