MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065923699 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/026

Expanding the domain of contraction mapping in the inverse problem of imaging with incoherently scattered radiation

2007· article· en· W2065923699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse problemMathematicsNonlinear systemContraction (grammar)InverseInverse scattering problemContraction mappingScalingPixelRange (aeronautics)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisComputer scienceComputer visionPhysicsGeometryFixed point

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical formulation that provides a converging solution for the successive approximation solution of the inverse problem of imaging with incoherently scattered radiation is introduced. The nonlinear nature of this problem can cause its solution to oscillate between two physically acceptable domains. By nonlinear scaling of the forward problem, it is shown that the range of one of the two domains can be made to expand at the expense of the other. This enables contraction mapping of the iterative solution of the inverse problem over an extended domain. The mathematical features of this scaling approach are analytically demonstrated for a one-pixel inverse problem, to elucidate its features and limitations. Reconstruction for many-pixel tomographic images is then presented for ideal (error free) and noisy simulated measurements, demonstrating the ability of the presented scheme to solve the inverse problem for radiation scatter imaging over a wide range of physically acceptable attributes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it