Status of the muonic hydrogen Lamb-shift experiment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Lamb-shift experiment in muonic hydrogen (μ – p) aims to measure the energy difference between the [Formula: see text] atomic levels to a precision of 30 ppm. This would allow the r.m.s. proton charge radius r p to be deduced to a precision of 10 –3 and open a way to check bound-state quantum electrodynamics (QED) to a level of 10 –7 . The poor knowledge of the proton charge radius restricts tests of bound-state QED to the precision level of about 6 × 10 –6 , although the experimental data themselves (Lamb-shift in hydrogen) have reached a precision of × 10 –6 . Values for r p not depending on bound-state QED results from electron scattering experiments have a surprisingly large uncertainty of 2%. In our Lamb-shift experiment, low-energy negative muons are stopped in low-density hydrogen gas, where, following the μ – atomic capture and cascade, 1% of the muonic hydrogen atoms form the metastable 2S state with a lifetime of about 1 μs. A laser pulse at λ ≈ 6 μm is used to drive the 2S → 2P transition. Following the laser excitation, we observe the 1.9 keV X-ray being emitted during the subsequent de-excitation to the 1S state using large-area avalanche photodiodes. The resonance frequency and, hence, the Lamb shift and the proton charge radius are determined by measuring the intensity of the X-ray fluorescence as a function of the laser wavelength. The results of the run in December 2003 were negative but, nevertheless, promising. One by-product of the 2003 run was the first observation of the short-lived 2S component in muonic hydrogen. Currently, improvements in the laser-system, the experimental apparatus, and the data acquisition are being implemented. PACS Nos.: 36.10.Dr, 14.20.Dh, 42.62.Fi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".