MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2066032317 · doi:10.1109/acc.2014.6859252

Model predictive control of the cardiac amplitude of alternans PDE

2014· article· en· W2066032317 on OpenAlexaff
Felicia Yapari, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlActuatorSudden cardiac deathAmplitudeComputer scienceMathematicsCardiologyPhysicsControl (management)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sudden cardiac death resulting from ventricular arrhythmia is one of the leading causes of mortality in the United States. The beat-to-beat oscillations in the action potential duration (APD) of paced cardiac cells, defined as cardiac alternans, has been identified as a potential precursor to ventricular arrhythmia. Therefore, the annihilation of these alternans is a promising antiarrhythmic strategy. In this work, the small amplitude of alternans partial differential equation (PDE) for a one dimensional cable of cardiac cells is stabilized through model predictive control (MPC). In our proposed control strategy, both boundary and spatially distributed actuators are utilized in suppressing the alternans along the cable. The low-order MPC formulation is developed for the finite-dimensional, discrete state space representation of the PDE. Furthermore, input and state constraints are addressed explicitly in the MPC formulation. The input constraints may arise due to actuator limitations, while state constraints are naturally present in cardiac systems. By satisfying these constraints, we can ensure that the controller action will not induce conduction block in the cardiac cells. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the successful annihilation of alternans using the proposed control algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→