β-1,3-Glucan Binding by a Thermostable Carbohydrate-Binding Module from <i>Thermotoga maritima</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The C-terminal 155 amino acids of the putative laminarinase, Lam16A, from T. maritima comprise a highly thermostable family 4 CBM that binds beta-1,3- and beta-(1,3)(1,4)-glucans. Laminarin, a beta-1,3-glucan, presented two classes of binding sites for TmCBM4-2, one with a very high affinity (3.5 x 10(7) M(-1)) and one with a 100-fold lower affinity (2.4 x 10(5) M(-1)). The affinities for laminarioligosaccharides and beta-(1,3)(1,4)-glucans ranged from approximately 2 x 10(5) to approximately 2.5 x 10(6) M(-1). Cellooligosaccharides and laminariobiose were bound only very weakly (K(a)s approximately 5 x 10(3) M(-1)). Spectroscopic and mutagenic studies implicated the involvement of three tryptophan residues (W28, W58, and W99) and one tyrosine residue (Y23) in ligand binding. Binding was enthalpically driven and associated with large negative changes in heat capacity. Temperature and osmotic conditions profoundly influenced binding. For the first time in solution, the direct uptake and release of water in CBM binding are demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".