MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066064086 · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705568

Pharmacological characterisation of a rat model of incisional pain

2004· article· en· W2066064086 on OpenAlexaff
Garth T. Whiteside, James Harrison, Jamie Boulet, Lilly Mark, Michelle Pearson, Susan L. Gottshall, Katharine Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPurdue Pharma (Canada)
FundersPurdue UniversityAmgen
KeywordsHyperalgesiaMedicineAllodyniaGabapentinMorphineAnesthesiaAnalgesicEtoricoxibNociceptionPharmacologyCelecoxibInternal medicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Both clinical and preclinical models of postsurgical pain are being used more frequently in the early evaluation of new chemical entities. In order to assess the validity and reliability of a rat model of postincisional pain, the effects of different classes of clinically effective analgesic drugs were evaluated against multiple behavioural end points. 2. Following surgical incision, under general anaesthesia, of the plantar surface of the rat hind paw, we determined the time course of mechanical hyperalgesia, tactile allodynia and hind limb weight bearing using the Randall-Selitto (paw pressure) assay, electronic von Frey and dual channel weight averager, respectively. Behavioural evaluations began 24 h following surgery, and were continued for 9-14 days. 3. Mechanical hyperalgesia, tactile allodynia and a decrease in weight bearing were present on the affected limb within 1 day of surgery with maximum sensitivity 1-3 days postsurgery. Accordingly, we examined the effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), morphine and gabapentin, on established hyperalgesia and allodynia, 1 day following plantar incision.4. In accordance with previous reports, both systemic morphine and gabapentin administration reversed mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in the incised rat hind paw. Both drugs were more potent against mechanical hyperalgesia than tactile allodynia. 5. All of the NSAIDs tested, including cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitors, reversed mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in the incised rat hind paw. The rank order of potency for both hyperalgesia and allodynia was indomethacin > celecoxib > etoricoxib > naproxen. 6. We have investigated the potency and efficacy of different classes of analgesic drugs in a rat model of postincisional pain. The rank order of potency for these drugs reflects their utility in treating postoperative pain in the clinic. As these compounds showed reliable efficacy across two different behavioural end points, the Randall-Selitto (paw pressure) assay and electronic von Frey, these methods may prove useful in the study of postsurgical pain and the assessment of novel treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207