MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066081256 · doi:10.1063/1.1428348

Use of crystal polymorphs for resolving an equilibrium liquid’s state on supercooling to 0 K

2002· article· en· W2066081256 on OpenAlexaff
G. P. Johari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercoolingThermodynamicsZero (linguistics)Crystal (programming language)ChemistryHeat capacityEntropy (arrow of time)Materials sciencePhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are two ways by which an equilibrium liquid’s heat capacity, Cp,liq, is seen to decrease to zero on cooling to 0 K: (i) decrease abruptly first to the Cp of its ordered crystal at T>0 K, and thereafter the crystal’s Cp decrease to zero at 0 K, and (ii) decrease continuously to zero at 0 K. The prohibitively long time needed for Cp measurements at sufficiently low temperatures has prevented one from determining the relative merits of these two inferences. Here, we propose a method for doing so by a comparative analysis of the Cp data of an equilibrium liquid and of its two crystalline forms, one of which is orientationally disordered. The method is then used to test these merits with the available Cp and entropy data of ethanol. The results support the inference of a continuous decrease in Cp to zero at 0 K, but not that of an abrupt decrease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207