Rearrangements of the Diels−Alder Cycloadducts Obtained from Acetylenic Sulfones and 1,3-Diphenylisobenzofuran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1,3-Diphenylisobenzofuran afforded Diels-Alder cycloadducts 4a,b with n-butyl- and phenyl-substituted acetylenic sulfones 3a,b, respectively. The products underwent various types of rearrangements under pyrolytic, acid-catalyzed, and photochemical conditions. In the presence of acid, or upon heating in xylenes, they afforded the ketones 5a,b. In addition, the dehydration product 7a was produced from the pyrolysis of 4a, and the unexpected transposed ketone 6b was generated under acid-catalyzed or pyrolytic conditions from 4b via a postulated epoxide intermediate. The photolysis of 4a afforded ketone 5a as the sole isolated product, whereas 5b afforded oxepin 8b and indenyl phenyl ketone 9b. The formation of the latter two products can be rationalized by a series of pericyclic reactions. These include an intramolecular [2+2] cycloaddition, followed by a 1,3-dipolar cycloreversion, for the transformation of 4b to 8b and a series of electrocyclic and [1,3]sigmatropic reactions to convert 8b into 9b.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".