Genotype by environment interaction effect on yield and quality of potatoes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colour is an important character in the processing of potatoes for French fries. French fry colour is closely associated with sugar content in the tuber. This study examines the stability of yield, sugar content and French fry colour for eight potato cultivars and advanced selections in four environments. Stability was determined using three approaches based on the Eberhart-Russell, Tai and GGE Biplot analyses. The GGE Biplot analysis provided a better characterization of stability than the other two analyses. The most stable and best performing genotypes for both French fry colour and total sugars were Russet Burbank and Umatilla Russet. Cal White had high yield and yield stability but had average stability for poor (dark) French fry colour. The GGE biplot analysis was able to identify mega-environments and those environments which optimized differentiation between genotypes. Both factors are important for the optimization of resources for testing new genotypes. Stability for quality factors in potato can be as important or more important than yield for some processing uses. In this study, genotypes with stability for sugar content and French fry colour were identified and these may be used as parents in breeding for stability. Key words: Potato, yield stability, quality, French fry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".