MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066125425 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780418

Predicting pressure gradients in heavy oil—water pipelines

2000· article· en· W2066125425 on OpenAlexaffvenue
M. McKibben, Randall G. Gillies, C. A. Shook

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressure gradientPipeline transportAsphaltPetroleum engineeringFlow (mathematics)Pressure dropOil fieldOil wellMechanicsEnvironmental scienceFraction (chemistry)GeologyMaterials scienceChemistryEnvironmental engineeringChromatographyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Experimental investigations of the flow of water‐heavy oil mixtures at velocities typical of oil‐field gathering systems show that continuous water assisted flow at very low pressure gradients can be achieved. The principal criterion to be satisfied in establishing this desirable flow regime appears to be use of sufficient water, with the velocity also playing a role. It also appears that oil viscosity and water fraction effects on pressure gradient are small provided the beneficial flow regime is established. The flows resemble core‐annular flow, which has been observed previously in Bitumen froth and water‐heavy oil flows, with an oil layer on the pipe wall. However, the correlation for pressure gradient is somewhat different from that reported previously for Bitumen froth flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207