MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066131368 · doi:10.1117/12.844098

3D shape reconstruction of bone from two x-ray images using 2D/3D non-rigid registration based on moving least-squares deformation

2010· article· en· W2066131368 on OpenAlexafffund
Thierry Cresson, Dominic Branchaud, Ramnada Chav, B. Godbout, Jacques A. de Guise

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureHôpital Notre-Dame
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMedical diagnosisPlanarMedical imagingDeformation (meteorology)Iterative reconstructionMoving least squaresComputer graphics (images)Materials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several studies based on biplanar radiography technologies are foreseen as great systems for 3D-reconstruction applications for medical diagnoses. This paper proposes a non-rigid registration method to estimate a 3D personalized shape of bone models from two planar x-ray images using an as-rigid-as-possible deformation approach based on a moving least-squares optimization method. Based on interactive deformation methods, the proposed technique has the ability to let a user improve readily and with simplicity a 3D reconstruction which is an important step in clinical applications. Experimental evaluations of six anatomical femur specimens demonstrate good performances of the proposed approach in terms of accuracy and robustness when compared to CT-scan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207