Culture et droit de la famille : de l’institution à l’autonomie individuelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, au cours du vingtième siècle, la progression de l’autonomie individuelle et la perte d’influence de l’Église catholique, accompagnée de la concurrence religieuse induite par le multiculturalisme, ont profondément transformé le droit de la famille. L’ancienne législation visait à favoriser la conception unitaire de la famille, basée sur le mariage, au nom de l’intérêt supérieur de la société. L’auteur estime qu’il existe désormais un nouveau régime du droit de la famille, dont l’objectif principal est d’assurer la protection, notamment économique, des membres de la cellule familiale. Le corps familial, institution sociétale centrale, dont la conception traditionnelle et religieuse faisait reposer l’autorité absolue sur le mari, n’échappe dorénavant plus à la volonté individuelle et fonde ses grandes lignes sur les valeurs fondamentales que sont l’égalité et l’autonomie individuelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".