<i>Structure in Science and Art</i> edited by Wendy Pullan and Harshad Bhadeshia. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000. 203 pp., illus. Trade. ISBN: 0-521-78258-9.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
February 01 2002 Structure in Science and Art Structure in Science and Art edited by WendyPullan and HarshadBhadeshia. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000. 203 pp., illus. Trade. ISBN: 0-521-78258-9. David Topper David Topper The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg MB, R3B 2E9, Canada. E-mail: Topper@Uwinnipeg.ca. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information David Topper The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg MB, R3B 2E9, Canada. E-mail: Topper@Uwinnipeg.ca. Online Issn: 1530-9282 Print Issn: 0024-094X © 2002 ISAST2002 Leonardo (2002) 35 (1): 105. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2002.35.1.105a Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation David Topper; Structure in Science and Art. Leonardo 2002; 35 (1): 105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2002.35.1.105a Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsLeonardo Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2002 ISAST2002 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.127 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".