MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066183689 · doi:10.1002/pssb.200982007

Amorphous selenium and its alloys from early xeroradiography to high resolution X‐ray image detectors and ultrasensitive imaging tubes

2009· article· en· W2066183689 on OpenAlexafffund
Safa Kasap, J. Frey, George Belev, O. Tousignant, Habib Mani, Luc Laperrière, Alla Reznik, J. A. Rowlands

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreLakehead UniversityThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteCégep de Saint-LaurentUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDark currentDetective quantum efficiencyOptoelectronicsDetectorX-ray detectorMaterials sciencePhotoconductivityElectronQuantum efficiencyXeroradiographyOpticsPhotodetectorPhysicsImage qualityComputer scienceRadiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We describe the progress in the science and technology of stabilized a‐Se from its early use in xerography and xeroradiography to its present use in commercial modern flat panel X‐ray imagers and ultrasensitive video tubes which utilize impact ionization of drifting holes. Both electrons and holes can drift in stabilized a‐Se, which is a distinct advantage since X‐ray photogeneration of charge carriers occurs throughout the bulk of the photoconductive layer. An a‐Se photoconductor has to be operated at high fields to ensure that the photogeneration efficiency is sufficiently large to provide reasonable X‐ray sensitivity. However, at high fields, the dark current is unacceptably large in simple metal/a‐Se/metal devices, and special multilayer device structures need to be designed. The dark current decays with time and increases with the nominal applied field. The reduction of the dark current to a tolerable level was one of the key factors that lead to the commercialization of a‐Se X‐ray detectors. We discuss the origin of the dark current, and highlight some of the current challenges in the design of next generation detectors. We also discuss the origin of impact ionization in a‐Se, and its fruitful utilization in ultrasensitive imaging devices, including the Harpicon, which are likely to lead to new high detective quantum efficiency detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations195
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (b)Same topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207