Water-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of the Radical Cation of Ketene in the Gas Phase: Theory and Experiment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both theoretical and experimental investigations are reported for the gas-phase hydrolysis of the radical cation of ketene, H(2)CCO(*+). Density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) method indicates that a second water molecule is required as a catalyst for the addition of water across the C=O bond in H(2)CCO(*+) by eliminating the activation barrier for the conversion of [H(2)CCO.H(2)O](*+) to [H(2)CC(OH)(2)](*+). Theory further indicates that [H(2)CC(OH)(2).H(2)O](*+) may recombine with electrons to produce neutral acetic acid. Experimental results of flow-reactor tandem mass spectrometer experiments in which CH(2)CO(*+) ions were produced either directly from ketene by electron transfer or by the chemical reaction of CH(2)(*+) with CO are consistent with formation of an (C(2),H(4),O(2))(*+) ion in a reaction second-order in H(2)O. Furthermore, comparative multi-CID experiments indicate that this ion is likely to be the enolic CH(2)C(OH)(2)(*+) cation. The results suggest a possible mechanism for the formation of acetic acid from ketene and water on icy surfaces in hot cores and interstellar clouds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".